you might be the only one watching.....nobody else gives a good hoot about what she wants to lie about this time.

will be almost as entertaining as Fox "News" - this infomercial will certainly provide good fodder for the recall

I would like to know what actions will be taken if she uses the opportunity, using city resources, to defend herself in her recall campaign. I believe using city resources in a campaign is illegal. Can anyone knowledgeably address this issue?

Every incumbent office-holder uses State of the City, State of the State, State of the Union addresses to promote the good things they are doing. That’s why it’s so hard to unseat incumbents and why we need term limits at all levels of government. Why should Mayor Daniels be criticized for doing it, especially since she has to defend her seat three years early in November?

You forced her to raise money and campaign for an extra election (3 years early!) against an unknown opponent and then accused her of moving the date from the spring to the fall for political gain. Seems fair enough to me, but maybe she had other reasons that we don’t know about.

Good luck filing yet another complaint with the government, wasting more tax money! By the way, the recall has already cost the taxpayers plenty (a panel of judges looking over the proposal, city employees figuring out what happens if it’s successful, etc.) Salaries of government employees aren’t free. If they were sitting around waiting for something to do we wouldn’t need them.

You have every right to do file petitions and ballot proposals, but please quit saying it costs the taxpayers nothing.

Dale, Why do you continue to try to mislead people? You have been corrected numerous times regarding your misinformation of facts. THERE IS NO EXTRA ELECTION! As far as the panel looking over the proposal, that is their job. What about the ten fictitious proposals that Janice's buddy Nick made them review? Common sense tells you that that costs more than the one currently on the ballot. I hope people who are reading this have keyed into your trying to mislead them.

And, yes, she did move the State of the City address from when it is typically given; i.e. Jan. or Feb. This was just another of her political ploys.

These actions are another indication of her misuse of her position and reason to VOTE YES TO RECALL JANICE DANIELS.

By the way, Dale, what good things has she done since being elected? If you listen to her State of the City, she was not instrumental in any of the accomplishments.

The simple fact is that Janice Daniels has had no positive impact on this city. She was not able to speak to any accomplishment for which she is responsible, and any positive highlights of the city's progress are due in very large part to the previous council and city administration. Other positive growth in the city would have happened regardless of who holds the seat of Mayor.

Did this event really mean anything? I kind of feel like it was really only noticed by people who have already made up their minds about the mayor and the recall. Is it really going to change anyone's mind? Will undecided voters take notice? I don't think so.