This weekend marks the 100th anniversary of the RMS Titanic’s sinking. This year, it also coincides with Earth Day and the annual tax preparation deadline in a pivotal presidential election year. What would the people living in 1912 think if they could see us today?
Improvements in Technology Limited by Business Constraints
Ship design had improved greatly since the Wasa sunk on her maiden voyage in Stockholm harbor in 1628 because it was top-heavy and did not have enough ballast. But the Titanic was not built as safe as some ships built more than 50 years before because of competitive pressures, and had lifeboats for only a third of its passengers. While it appears that the oft-quoted “God himself could not sink this ship,” was probably just someone reassuring a nervous passenger and not mocking God, the sea is still a dangerous place with powerful forces that remind us we are not in control.
Visitors can go to Greenfield Village in Dearborn to see what life was like in that era, take a ride in a Model T, and visit the Wright brothers’ home and Edison’s laboratory. The Henry Ford Museum will host the largest touring exhibition of Titanic: The Artifact Exhibition, through September 30, 2012.
Summer vacation trips to Mackinac Island or Pictured Rocks National Lakeshore might include a stop at Whitefish Point to visit the lighthouse and Shipwreck Museum (see photos). Lighthouses and lifesaving stations greatly reduced loss of life on the Great Lakes, but pilot error caused many collisions. The freighter Edmund Fitzgerald, largest on the Great Lakes when launched in 1958, succumbed to a severe Lake Superior storm as recently as November, 1975, with the loss of the entire crew of 29.
Today’s ships, planes and cars are safer than ever. Safety features help sell cars now, yet people don’t take advantage of all the available technology, with some only fastening their seat belts because it’s the law. This week Michigan’s governor signed the repeal of Michigan’s mandatory motorcycle helmet law, despite the lack of good arguments for repeal. 31 U.S. states now allow bikers to decide to risk their lives at everyone else’s expense.
Women and Children First - Chivalry’s Epitaph
A little known memorial in Washington D.C. designed by Gertrude Vanderbilt Whitney to the men on the Titanic has this inscription: “TO THE BRAVE MEN WHO PERISHED IN THE WRECK OF THE TITANIC APRIL 15, 1912. THEY GAVE THEIR LIVES THAT WOMEN AND CHILDREN MIGHT BE SAVED. ERECTED BY THE WOMEN OF AMERICA” You can watch Jerry Griffith’s 2.5 minute video about it. 80% of the men died, while 74% of women survived. It’s been said that if chilvary is dead, this is its epitaph.
Life has changed a lot in the last century for women. They gained the right to vote in 1920; they worked as “Rosie the Riveter” during WW2 making trucks and tanks for the war effort; nowadays they come perilously close to serving in combat. Is this really wise, however, when we think that the main objective of the military is break things and kill people? Certainly we want them involved in strategy and support roles, but the objective in combat is to win, and there’s a reason why men are usually better at basketball, football and other physical sports. Don’t we want our best team on the field, never mind women’s vulnerability if they are captured as a POW? I’m absolutely in favor of equal opportunity, but we shouldn’t be enforcing equal outcomes as social engineering.
Women are still sensitive about their roles, with stay at home moms subtly disrespected by their peers and openly by some this past week for political reasons. Sure, there’s backpedaling and clarification, but the insult is felt.
Personal Pleasure and the Earth – the gods of this Age
The people of 1912 might be impressed by our technology, but they’d probably not completely approve of how we use it. Personal fulfillment has been raised to a ridiculous level, where we argue about whether to wear helmets on motorcycles and end lives of babies at the same gestational age where we do surgery to save the lives of others, depending on the desire of the mother.
Some worship the earth instead of its Creator, thinking that it’s immoral to slap a mosquito. Not many are that extreme, but we have many environmental laws that protect animals and plants at the expense of people’s livelihoods. This is OK if everyone agrees we can afford it, but tough luck for those who lose their jobs as a result.
Conservation is a good thing, and we need to have some old growth forests and plenty of quiet places to enjoy, but in general trees are a crop and should be viewed that way. DDT is still banned worldwide even though it could be used selectively in Africa to save millions of people from dying from malaria. The solution isn’t to love the earth less, but to value people more.
Thumbgens: Trivia Trumps Face-to-Face Interaction
Today’s communication technology is probably the biggest change, especially in recent years with the advent of the internet and mobile devices. But new ways aren’t always better: texting is slower than Morse Code. Watch this video if you don’t believe it. We shouldn’t be too critical of young people (dubbed Thumbgens by some because of their texting proficiency) and their overuse of technology, with the stereotypical family going out to dinner and everyone is busy playing with their toys instead of talking to each other.
Young people may handle Facebook better than others, although people of all ages waste time commenting on blogs or news articles (me included), but telling the world that you’re going shopping seems a bit silly. We all need to learn etiquette with cell phones; no, it’s not OK to talk to one friend on the phone when you’re out for lunch with another. That’s what voice mail is for.
Acquiring Stuff: How Much is Enough?
The ratrace controls us, as we struggle to keep up with the Joneses. We work harder and faster to fill our houses with toys and our lives with pleasure. Some make a career out of avoiding work, with the government encouraging them. He who dies with the most toys, still dies. I’m reminded of the story of the wealthy man who died; someone asked, “How much did he leave?” “All of it,” was the reply.
Conclusion
Changes since 1912 have been a mixed bag. The percentage of the U.S. population involved directly or indirectly in agriculture has declined from over 70% to less than 3% as farming methods have improved. We’re living longer, but are we living better? For sure we are living faster. Maybe if we slowed down and talked to each other more, we’d live happier lives.
Daffy Noodnicks
2:51 pm on Monday, April 16, 2012
Mr. Murrish:
Your comment about DDT is not correct. The ban on use is for agricultural purposes, although it still used for that purpose in a few places. The ban did not influence the use of DDT for the control of disease vectors like mosquitos that carry malaria. It is still used for that purpose in Africa and around the world. Aside from negative effects on human health and the environment, overuse of any pesticide, including DDT, causes resistance to develop in mosquito populations reducing effectiveness.
Dale Murrish
10:44 pm on Monday, April 16, 2012
Thanks for reading the article and for correcting my information about malaria and DDT. I couldn’t find the article where I read about it; maybe I remembered wrong from a few years ago. Here are some articles on the topic:
http://www.worldmag.com/articles/11432
http://www.worldmag.com/articles/16482
http://www.worldmag.com/articles/12575
http://www.worldmag.com/articles/11192
http://www.worldmag.com/articles/13479
Daffy Noodnicks
7:44 am on Tuesday, April 17, 2012
Mr. Murrish:
I can see how it would be easy to become misinformed on this topic. I clicked on the last article you cited and it gave inaccurate information on this topic.
amused observer
9:04 am on Tuesday, April 17, 2012
Heavens to Betsy. A fundamentalist Christian publication giving inaccurate information?? What is this world coming too?
Dale Murrish
7:22 pm on Tuesday, April 17, 2012
Daffy, some specifics would be helpful. I’ve read WORLD magazine for years and found them to be receptive to correcting any errors. If there were errors and a reader pointed it out, they would publish the correction. I assume the first 4 articles were accurate, then?
Daffy Noodnicks
8:35 pm on Tuesday, April 17, 2012
The statement that millions died as a result of the DDT ban was not accurate. I was referrIng to that.
I did not click on the others. I really don't have the time so I am not fact checking them. I would suggest checking some other sources. An online encyclopedia or even Wikipedia may give some useful basic information. You could then judge for yourself what is accurate. I could point you to a number of scholarly sources if you are interested. One of the things I've done in my life is work as an environmental chemist/scientist/compliance professional. I know a lot about DDT.
Dale Murrish
7:23 pm on Tuesday, April 17, 2012
Amused Observer, your insults are not appreciated. WORLD has high standards of journalistic integrity and is hardly a “fundamentalist” Christian publication. They give accurate news from a Christian perspective. Where do you get YOUR news?
Fundamentalists are a subset of evangelicals, who make up 26% of the U.S. population.
http://religions.pewforum.org/affiliations
Fundamentalist is commonly used as an insult, as you just did. Here’s a little church history for you:
From the Modernist controversy in the Presbyterian church came the Five Fundamentals (or basics) in 1910:
• The inspiration of the Bible by the Holy Spirit and the inerrancy of Scripture as a result of this.
• The virgin birth of Christ.
• The belief that Christ's death was an atonement (payment) for sin.
• The bodily resurrection of Christ.
• The historical reality of Christ's miracles.
The Fundamentalists were so labeled by their Modernist opponents. All orthodox Christians (which is most Americans) believe in these basics. So you have just insulted most of your fellow Americans and thereby their King.
Many Christians also believe in the literal Genesis creation account. Since Jesus quoted the creation account when he taught about marriage and didn’t feel a need to correct it, we should be careful before we read it as allegory or dismiss it as a fairy tale.
http://troy.patch.com/blog_posts/origins-of-life-four-major-views
Jeff S.
9:00 pm on Tuesday, April 17, 2012
When Janice Daniels labeled same-sex couples as "queers", you jumped to her defense, saying that it was merely "an unfortunate choice of words" that prove she's "not a bigot". (http://troy.patch.com/blog_posts/residents-should-support-city-councils-decisions)
However, when someone says that the "WORLD" is a fundamentalist publication, you claim the writer is being insulting. In fact, you claim that the writer has insulted the majority of American citizens.
If someone can use the word "fundamentalist" as an insult, wouldn't you agree that Janice used the word "queer" as an insult?
Dr. Liam "America's Veterinarian"™ Wolfpuncher III, DVM
11:14 pm on Tuesday, April 17, 2012
Mr. Murrish, I sympathize!
When I tell people of my deep and abiding beliefs in the teachings of L. Ron Hubbard, people scoff at me! Only after they accept the truth, that humanity came to this planet as the result of an evil plot by the galactic ruler Xenu, do they take me seriously!
And don't get me started on Agenda 21! Did you know that it's an insidious plot by the U.N.? It's a blueprint for the "One World Order" or "New World Order," put out by the United Nations following the "Earth Summit" of 1992!
People keep telling me that the blacksmithing accident I had back in '82 left me with limited cognitive capacity, but it didn't prevent me from becoming a veterinarian!
Liam "America's Veterinarian"™ Wolfpuncher
amused observer
9:00 pm on Tuesday, April 17, 2012
Well Mr. Murrish, since Christians like yourself aren't concerned about insulting non-Christians by claiming that they are destined for Hell if they don't subscribe to your brand of fairy tale then I'm not really worried if they're insulted by my use of the term fundamentalist.
Dale Murrish
5:39 pm on Thursday, April 19, 2012
If we all meet our Maker when we die and He judges us as fit for heaven or hell, then what we believe matters. If hell is a real place, no one would wish their worst enemy to go there. Why not take that as a friendly warning instead of an insult? If they are wrong, and everyone goes to heaven when they die, as many believe, they have lost nothing other than offending a few people here on earth. If you are wrong, you're maybe headed for a place no one wants to go.
Or if you believe this life is all there is, then nothing we do on earth matters; there is no right nor wrong, just what is expedient. I'm glad I don't live in a world where the majority of people believe that and live it out. That would be hell on earth.
As a Christian, I'm insulted when someone attacks my beliefs or my King, but I'm not going to do anything more than point it out as being uncivil. Nor will I force my beliefs on someone else, but I will not be quiet either.
Dale Murrish
7:13 am on Wednesday, April 18, 2012
Daffy, I think you misinterpreted what was written. Millions have indeed died as a result of the ban, not directly, but indirectly because of the mindset that it caused. Issues are always more complicated than can be summed up in a brief article. I get frustrated when I hear the auto industry used as a political football by both sides.
I took several hours writing the article; you took issue with one sentence and then when I showed you where I got my information some articulate but ignorant rock-throwers joined you in attacking my source. I don't mind critical thinking with specifics but the subtle discrediting is guilt by association and irks me.
Wikipedia is only as good a source as the contributors. The founders lean left as do most of the articles. That's why most classes limit the use of it as a source. When I looked up Fundamentalism it was not neutral at all. I had to search harder to find what I had learned during my deacon's training in the Orthodox Presbyterian Church.
Maybe I'll do an article about media bias; that should really spark some thoughtful comments from you and also more rock-throwing from people like Wolfpuncher and amused observer!
Daffy Noodnicks
9:38 am on Wednesday, April 18, 2012
Mr. Murrish:
I don't see how I misinterpreted anything. Both you and the article you cited explicitly stated people died from malaria although DDT could have been used to save them, blaming the ban treaty. This is not correct. Your statement about the ban treaty resulting in the death of millions is unclear. I fail to see how almost every country in the world agreeing to limit the use of a persistent toxic substance to the control of disease vectors could lead to a mindset that caused the death of millions. In fact, a very strong argument could be made to the contrary.
I agree with you about the auto industry.
I didn't agree with a lot of what you wrote, but they are your opinions and you are entitled to them. I was simply pointing out something you wrote, which I have some knowledge of, was factually incorrect. I thought you would be interested.
I have no control over the actions of other people. I do note you have thrown some rocks yourself. You should not be surprised if others toss some your way, although I don't think I have. If you believe I did, it was not intentional.
I agree with you about Wikipedia. It is not a scholarly source and should be taken with a grain of salt, but it can be a good jumping off point for other investigation, especially the sources cited. I hardly ever rely upon one source for anything. Perhaps you might try an encyclopedia as I suggested. My offer to refer other sources stands.
Dale Murrish
7:15 am on Wednesday, April 18, 2012
Jeff, both are insults and are wrong. Mayor Daniels apologized for hers graciously but was refused quite ungraciously (read the blog comments calling her a bigot).
So far I haven't heard any apologies from either Wolfpuncher or amused observer.
Dr. Liam "America's Veterinarian"™ Wolfpuncher III, DVM
10:20 am on Wednesday, April 18, 2012
Mr. Murrish, how dare you, sir!
You have besmirched my reputation by claiming that I have insulted you! If you do not withdraw your insult, you can expect to hear from my second!
If we must meet upon the field of honor, I will rise from my wheelchair, stand upon my peg leg, and allow you to choose your instrumentality!
So I beseech you, sir, withdraw your insult!
Liam "America's Veterinarian"™ Wolfpuncher
Calan
5:38 pm on Thursday, April 19, 2012
Dale,
Mayor Daniels "attempt" at an apology came with caveats, complaints and misinformation (you can read that as lies if you like). That "attempt" only came after she made several public statements and attempts to brush it aside as nothing, inconsequential, a joke or something intended to be funny.
True apologies do not need caveats, do not contain complaints about those you are apologizing to, and certainly don't contain misinformation intended to play the part of the victim. Nothing was ungraciously accepted because nothing was offered graciously.
Fred Phelps and his kin attend soldiers funerals, gay pride parades and a whole host of other events holding up signs with homophobic and bigoted statements, signs that read "thank god for dead soldiers" & "thank god for ied's", placards that say things like "god hates f*gs" & "f*g soldier." Her comment would have been right at home on a sign carried by any one of the Phelps crew. Although I have not seen it myself, I was told that Shirley Phelps-Roper even commented in support of Mayor Daniels and her comment... Now theres an endorsement that Daniels could include in her next mailer!
Dale Murrish
5:38 pm on Thursday, April 19, 2012
Daffy, thanks for correcting my information on malaria and DDT. I reread the string of comments and now I think I understand that DDT was banned only for agricultural purposes, not fighting diseases like malaria. So I’m glad to be corrected; I do not like to spread misinformation.
I was trying to make the general point that people are more valuable than animals, and apparently I picked a bad example because of incomplete information. So I apologize and stand corrected.
You didn’t throw any rocks, but your initial vagueness combined with the insults from others sarcastically calling WORLD a fundamentalist Christian magazine, which it’s not (and what’s wrong with that anyway, as long as the information is accurate?), made a perfect storm. So I responded with some facts (which, as usual, were not disputed by the rock-throwers, just ridiculed with more sarcasm) and a few rocks. Usually the best way to respond to fools (I do not mean you) is to ignore them; sometimes it’s necessary to throw some well-aimed rocks in response to an onslaught.
I’m glad we can agree to agree about some things, and agree to disagree about others, and not be disagreeable. Thanks for contributing to a civil conversation; I’ll know who to ask about DDT in the future!